CARR 88-90

 

CCAR RESPONSA

 

Contemporary American Reform Responsa

 

52. Homosexual Convert*

QUESTION: “In

our community there is a small group of ‘gay’ Jews who have gathered together to form a

havurah (Some of them are members of my congregation). The havurah meets

on a regular basis and holds a monthly shabbat service. Occasionally members of the

havurah attend regular services at the Temple or join us for special programs. We have

attempted to be as open to them as possible. Recently a few non-Jews have been attracted to

the havurah. Several of them have indicated an interest in Jewish life, and one individual

in particular has approached me in regards to the possibility of studying in order to convert to

Judaism.” In light of the strong antipathy of Judaism to homosexuality, should we accept a

known and active homosexual who desires to convert to Judaism? (Rabbi R. Safran, Ft. Wayne,

IN)

ANSWER: The attitude of traditional Judaism to homosexuality is clear. The

Biblical prohibition against homosexuality is absolute as seen in the verses–“Do not lie with a

male as one lies with a woman; it is an abhorrence” (Lev. 18.22); “if a man lies with a male as

one lies with a woman, the two of them have done an abhorrent thing; they shall be put to death –

their blood-guilt is upon them” (Lev. 20.13). Other statements are equally clear. The Talmudic

discussion of the matter makes no substantive changes and continues the prohibition. It deals

with the question of minors, duress and various forms of the homosexual act (San. 53a ff; Yeb.

83b; Ker. 2a ff; Ned. 51a, etc.). In the subsequent codes, the matter is briefly mentioned with the

same conclusions (Yad Hil. Issurei Biah 1.5, 22.2; Tur and Shulhan Arukh Even

Haezer 24). There is very little material in the responsa literature which deals with

homosexuality, as it does not seem to have been a major problem. The commentators to the

above mentioned section of the Shulhan Arukh felt that suspicion of homosexuality could

not arise in their day, and so various preventive restrictions were superfluous. For example,

Moses Rifkes (seventeenth century Poland) stated that this sin did not exist in his time (Be’er

Hagolah). Until the most recent modern period, there has been no further discussion of this

matter.

The Central Conference of American Rabbis has dealt with the issue of

homosexuality over a number of years. In 1977, the following resolution was

adopted:

Whereas, the Central Conference of American Rabbis consistently

supported civil rights and civil liberties for all people, especially for those whom these rights and

liberties have been withheld, and

Whereas, homosexuals have been in our

society long endured discrimination,

Be it therefore resolved, that we

encourage legislation which decriminalizes homosexual acts between consenting adults, and

prohibits discrimination against them as persons, and

Be it further resolved,

that our Reform Jewish religious organizations undertake programs in cooperation with the total

Jewish community to implement the above stand.

We will not discuss the modern

Jewish attitude toward homosexuals which has been shaped by two factors: (a) the attitude of

tradition towards homosexuality, (b) our contemporary understanding of homosexuality, which

sees homosexuality as an illness, a genetically based dysfunction or a sexual preference and life

style. There is disagreement whether homosexuality represents a willful act or a response to

which the individual is driven.

If a homosexual comes to us and seeks conversion, we

should explain the attitude of traditional Judaism and that of our Reform Movement to him quite

clearly. After that, if he continues to show an interest in Judaism and wishes to convert, then we

may accept him as any other convert.

The entire matter is somewhat complicated by

the fact that this group of homosexuals has organized itself into a havurah. We must ask

ourselves whether it is simply for the purpose of companionship, or if this is a group who will

seek to attract others to a homosexual lifestyle. In the case of the latter, we could certainly not

accept a convert who intends to influence others in that direction. Otherwise, a homosexual who

wishes to convert to Judaism should be accepted as any other convert.

June 1982

 

If needed, please consult Abbreviations used in CCAR Responsa.